Jocelyn<p>Why does <a href="https://mastodon.gougere.fr/tags/Mastodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Mastodon</span></a> use <a href="https://mastodon.gougere.fr/tags/PNG" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PNG</span></a> format to share <a href="https://mastodon.gougere.fr/tags/embeddedImages" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>embeddedImages</span></a> in <a href="https://mastodon.gougere.fr/tags/toots" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>toots</span></a>, and not <a href="https://mastodon.gougere.fr/tags/JPG" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>JPG</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gougere.fr/tags/JPEG" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>JPEG</span></a> ?</p><p>The aim of embedding images in a toot is in general not so share images with a print quality, and there are other means of sharing if that's the aim -- so why not gain a factor 2 or 3 on file size both for <a href="https://mastodon.gougere.fr/tags/environmental" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>environmental</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gougere.fr/tags/footprint" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>footprint</span></a> reduction and to reduce the burden on <a href="https://mastodon.gougere.fr/tags/instance" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>instance</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gougere.fr/tags/servers" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>servers</span></a> ?</p>